We think of American rebelliousness taking place in the 1770s, but the rebellion, as historian Adrian Weimer told us in this riveting presentation, began a century earlier. A hundred years before the American Revolution, Massachusetts colonists forged a constitutional culture and rebelled against arbitrary rule. Restoration era Massachusetts colonists - elite and poor alike - defended civil and religious liberties, a defiance based on a shared conviction that self-government was divinely sanctioned. A must-watch for anyone interested in Puritan politics and the culture that led to revolution.

In the wake of his 1660 restoration, Charles II’s government demanded that Puritan-led colonies change their voting practices, baptismal policies, and laws. That government surveyed local resources such as forests, a valuable source of masts for the English navy. For many New Englanders, these innovations were tantamount to an all-out challenge to their founding principles: self-government, religious accountability, accessible courts. Would they agree to Charles II's demands?

To enforce his demands for greater fealty, the king sent four royal commissioners on warships, ostensibly headed for New Netherland but easily redirected toward Boston. In the face of this threat to local rule, colonists had to decide whether they would submit to the royal commissioners’ authority, which they viewed as arbitrary because it was not accountable to the people, or whether they would take action to defy the crown.

Those resisting the crown included not just freemen (that is, voters) but also people often seen as excluded or marginalized, such as non-freemen, indentured servants, and women. Together they crafted a potent regional constitutional culture in defiance of Charles II that was characterized by a skepticism of metropolitan ambition, a defense of civil and religious liberties, and a conviction that their self-government was divinely sanctioned.

They expressed this constitutional culture through a set of well-rehearsed practices - including fast days, debates, committee work, and petitions. Equipped with a ready vocabulary for criticizing arbitrary rule, with a providentially informed capacity for risk-taking, and with a set of intellectual frameworks for divided sovereignty, the constitutional culture that New Englanders forged would not easily succumb to an imperial authority intent on consolidating its power.

You can purchase a copy of A Constitutional Culture here.

Adrian Chastain Weimer is professor of history at Providence College. She is the author most recently of A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023), which centers on grassroots political mobilizing in the 1660s, when Puritan colonists creatively organized to protect local institutions from the demands of the newly restored Stuart monarchy. Her first book, Martyrs' Mirror: Persecution and Holiness in Early New England (Oxford University Press, 2011), explores how Puritans, Baptists, and Quakers imagined themselves within historical narratives of persecution, especially the stories in John Foxe’s Book of Martyrs. Her work has been honored with the Jane Dempsey Douglass Prize and the Michael Kennedy Prize, and with fellowships from the American Council of Learned Societies, the Andrew Mellon Foundation, the Folger Shakespeare Library, the Massachusetts Historical Society, the American Antiquarian Society, and the National Endowment for the Humanities.